Independence
The Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, prepared by
the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) identifies
types of threats to independence These are the followings:- .
Self-interest threats
Self-review threats
Advocacy threats
Familiarity threats
Intimidation threats
The firm advises the following principles to the managing
partner, engagement partner, quality control partner and
engagement team members to safeguard against the aforesaid
threats:-
Always be and appears to be independent of the entities that
they are performing professional services;
Inculcate integrity, objectivity and professional scepticism
while performing professional services;
Diligently consider whether it involves threats to his
independence;
Compliance of provisions of Companies Act, 2013
Follow Provisions contained under the Chartered Accountants
Act, 1949, Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 and under
Code of Ethics
The firm also takes declaration for Independence as suggested
in SQC-1 from the team members that he or immediate family
members or other entities in which they have direct or
indirect interest:-
Do not have transactions related to Investments, borrowings
and any other financial transactions with the entity or to an
officer, director or major shareholder of that entity and
group entry to whom any assurance services are rendered by the
M/s Patel Jain & Associates;
Do not hold a position as an executor, administrator, or
trustee of a trust/estate, and do not have authority to make
investment decisions for the trust/estate;
Do not associate with an entity or an officer, director or
major shareholder of that entity and group entity to whom any
assurance services are rendered by the M/s Patel Jain &
Associates;
Do not obtain a new, or make significant changes to an
existing, insurance product of any kind from an entity or from
an officer, director or major shareholder of that entity and
group entity to whom any assurance services are rendered by
the M/s Patel Jain & Associates;
Do not have a business relationship with or joint investment
(e.g., partnership interests) in an entity or with an officer,
director or major shareholder of that entity and group entity
to whom any assurance services are rendered by the M/s Patel
Jain & Associates
Do not negotiate employments offer with the entity or an
officer, director or major shareholder of that entity and
group entity to whom any assurance services are rendered by
the M/s. Patel Jain & Associates
In case of any ethical threat in any specific case,
safeguards, as prescribed in terms of the professional code of
ethics, are adopted.
Integrity
Straight forward and honest in our professional and business
relationships
Truthful about the services provided, the knowledge, and the
experience
Objective
Do not allow bias, conflict of interest, or undue influence of
others to override our professional judgments
Address differences of opinion and handle them constructively
and professionally
Engagement Performance
The Firm ensures that the engagement is performed, supervised,
documented, reported and communicated in accordance with the
requirement of professional standards, applicable regulators.
The same is ensured through the following:
Ensuring those relevant auditing standards such as those
dealing with risk assessment, fraud, etc. that deal with the
planning phase of engagement are duly complied with
Providing adequate supervision during the course of an
engagement, including briefing the engagement team on the
objectives of their work. The training, ability, and
experience of the personnel are considered when assigning
supervisors to the engagement. Requiring that a written work
program be used and monitored for all engagements.
Requiring that there is consistency in the quality of
engagement performance. Consistency may be accomplished
through written or electronic manuals, software tools,
checklists, templates, models or other forms of standardized
documentation, and industry or subject matter-specific
guidance material.
Requiring that a suitable audit summary memorandum is
documented and kept among the engagement working papers to
provide a history of the planned risks (including fraud
risks), by what audit procedures those risks were mitigated,
conclusions on controls and substantive testing, and whether
the extent and quality of audit evidence examined to support
the audit opinion.
Addressing significant issues and newly identified risks
arising during the engagement, considering their significance,
and appropriately modifying the planned approach.
Requiring engagement documentation in accordance with
professional standards, applicable regulatory requirements,
and the Firm's policies.
Personnel Management
The Firm determines capabilities and competencies required for an engagement at me of
starting of the assignment
The allocation of team members are based on risk and competence require for the assignments
so that team members assume the responsibility to act on an assignment carefully, thoroughly
and on a timely basis
The allocation criteria also include the following:
The role of the Firm's system of QC and the Code of Ethics issued by the ICAI in ensuring
the integrity of the accounting, auditing, and attest functions to users of reports;
The professional standards applicable to the engagement and the industry in which the client
operates. Such standards include accounting, auditing, and attestation standards, and
relevant accounting and auditing framework applicable to the engagement as well as rules and
regulations issued by applicable regulators; and
The skills that contribute to sound professional judgment, including the ability to exercise
professional skepticism.
How the auditee uses information technology and the manner in which information systems are
used to record and maintain financial information.
Professional competence and due care
The firm has established certain criteria for recruitment of Staff and Article Assistant in a
manner so that it can achieve quality control policies designed to meet the highest standard
of the profession under the supervision of Managing partner
The firm also conducts education seminars and encourages personnel to attend for knowledge
enhancement and quality improvement of the personnel.
Aforesaid steps again and maintain staff's professional knowledge and skills at the level
required to ensure that the clients receive competent professional services and they act
diligently while providing professional services.
The allocation of team members are based on risk and competence require for the assignments
so that team members assume the responsibility to act on an assignment carefully, thoroughly
and on a timely basis
The firm evaluates written engagement leer duly signed by authorized signatories of the
client for beer understanding of the services to be performed especially regarding the
nature, scope and limitations of the services to be performed. Based on evaluation, the firm
assigns responsibility to engagement partner who has the appropriate capabilities,
competence, authority, and me to perform the role. The firm also monitors the workload and
availability of engagement partners to enable these individuals to have sufficient me to
adequately discharge their responsibilities.
The firm executes the same through the following
Designating an individual in the Firm to be responsible for the following activities:
Managing the human resources function.
Evaluating the Firm’s personnel needs by considering factors such as existing clientele,
anticipated growth, personnel turnover, and individual advancement
Developing criteria for determining which individuals will be involved in the interviewing
and hiring process
Establishing an understanding among the partners about the qualifications, attributes,
achievements, and experiences desired in entry-level and experienced personnel.
Setting guidelines for the additional procedures to be performed when hiring experienced
personnel, such as performing background checks and inquiring about any outstanding
regulatory
The firm determines the capabilities and competencies possessed by personnel by establishing
criteria or evaluating personal characteristics such as integrity, competence and motivation
and also evaluating the personnel at least annually to determine their capabilities and
competences. Selection of the personnel also depends upon the past experiences and the
performance evaluation, Nature of past assignments allocated to the personnel